 | | Re: New Gear Boxes and Motor Systems —Eric Sophie
|
| | | (...) Meeee two, I ordered two that is. I'll get mine and make a walker before you! LOL! The challange is on! e (21 years ago, 31-May-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: New Gear Boxes and Motor Systems —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | | | (...) Good luck! (...) Kevin (21 years ago, 31-May-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | I Win! —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | | (...) I ordered mine second day air before you even created the challenge. It showed up today. I've got my first walker. Not pretty, but is made exclusively from parts in 4094. I win! LOL! (URL) (...) Kevin (21 years ago, 4-Jun-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: I Win! —Eric Sophie
|
| | | | (...) Doh! You win! I'll get you yet! P.S. I got mine yesterday. P.S. The worm gear box is a superior design, less backlash, stays crispy in milk. e (21 years ago, 6-Jun-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | RE: I Win! —Bram Lambrecht
|
| | | | (...) But it's still a worm gear, so it's really only good for positioning devices, not for gear reduction. I agree with others that a small, efficient gear reducer would be more useful than another worm. --Bram Bram Lambrecht bram@cwru.edu (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jun-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: I Win! —Eric Sophie
|
| | | | (...) But, its an improvement. How many threads have been tossed around complaining about the backlash problem with worm gears and the various gear boxes. I'm telling you that this new gear box is an improved version of the old config. What's with (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jun-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
