|
|
 | | Re: A very inspiring design
|
| (...) next book? (23 years ago, 10-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.build)
| | | | | A very inspiring design
|
| Hi all, This new robot by Joe Nagata integrates so many solutions in such a simple design that I have little doubt it will be as instantly inspiring to many of you as it has been to me. (URL) building! Miguel Agullo (URL) (23 years ago, 10-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.build)
| | | | | Re: Single acting pneumatics with spring return
|
| (...) True, but there is one notable difference, as others have pointed out before: When compressiong air, the pressure difference is limited only by implementation details. The pressure inside the tank usually is not just slightly higher than (...) (23 years ago, 7-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: Technic MOTM needs a new name.
|
| (...) They are, but not for the reasons you state. (...) But LDraw *does* create LEGO models. Whether a model's physical parameters are stored in ABS molecules or mathematical data is irrelevant. Either method is an equally valid representation of (...) (23 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: Technic MOTM needs a new name.
|
| (...) He's alive! All this time I've been mis-pronouncing "loog-net" over and over in my head, just to flush him out. All we had to do was use his name in vain! KL P.S. just kidding about the "loog-net" thing :) (23 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
|
