 | | Re: Technic MOTM needs a new name.
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Tobbe Arnesson wrote: [snip] Tim, Did you actually talk to the other guys of ldraw.org before trying to use the name to bully Tobbe? I mean, ldraw.org isn't your personal site, is it? Is there a committee that makes these (...) (23 years ago, 4-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw) !
|
| |
| | Re: Technic MOTM needs a new name.
|
|
(...) Not exactly - neither Lugnet nor Ldraw actually have the word LEGO in them. And note that LEGO *have* acted exactly that way WRT legOS. ROSCO (23 years ago, 4-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Pneumatics: the old and the new
|
|
(...) Exactly! (...) That's right! (...) Oh oh! Methinks you have not had the simple pleasure of playing with a hand pump (the new type of course) and an air tank like in the 8250 Submarine or 8462 Tow Truck or such like. Try it! (...) No need, just (...) (23 years ago, 4-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic MOTM needs a new name.
|
|
(...) This is not just picky, this is completely out of line considering that if Lego acted the same way (and there are legal precendents from other companies), we would have no Lugnet and, of course, no LDRAW. How about TCM - Technic Creation(s) of (...) (23 years ago, 4-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Too much crane?
|
|
(...) subject, didn't you Jennifer???? And then you go and post a link to pictures of another Clark Classic, as if to just thumb your nose at us??!!?? Have you no shame???!!!??? But I think we're all glad you did 8?) That's really nice. Can't wait (...) (23 years ago, 3-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
