 | | Re: New Civil Engineer letter
|
|
I feel compelled to add; When I was a Meccanno fan, some years ago now, and the proud owner of a Set 10, complete with drawer cabinet, Lego hadn't invented gear wheels yet. Because we had Lego too, and it was the construction toy of choice for (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jul-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New Civil Engineer letter
|
|
(...) Yes, very much so! I think it would be a great idea to do so! What I am trying to say is that if you understand why the writer has the perception he does, and counteract it, I think your letter will be much more powerful. I think I see why he (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jul-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New Civil Engineer letter
|
|
(...) Well, I had both Meccano and Lego as a kid, and I can tell you that the Meccano didn't get a look in, past building a few things from the instructions. I really tried, but Meccano was just so slow to construct anything, and you couldn't really (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jul-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New Civil Engineer letter
|
|
(...) I think this is it: ftp://cherupakha.med...oflego.pdf Jennifer (URL) (24 years ago, 2-Jul-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: New Civil Engineer letter
|
|
(...) Hi Larry. Correct me if I misunderstand but you appear to be saying that the Lego idioms are quicker to learn than for the other construction toys. We also appear to agree that the writers perception is wrong. Do you support me attempting to (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jul-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
