 | | Re: 2007 sets: Huge RC Bulldozer and Combine Harvester
|
|
(...) Excellent pix. Looks like the small wheels used to form the bogies are a new wheel, am I right? (In addition to loads of other more obvious new parts.) -dave (18 years ago, 16-Jan-07, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 2007 sets: Huge RC Bulldozer and Combine Harvester
|
|
(...) Bulldozer. (URL) I especially like this pic of the treads- (URL) Adr. (18 years ago, 16-Jan-07, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 2007 sets: Huge RC Bulldozer and Combine Harvester
|
|
(...) released. Is it just me or does the new technic dozer bear a striking resemblance to the komatsu D575: (2 URLs) ?? -Ben (18 years ago, 15-Jan-07, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 8466 4 X 4 HELP!!!
|
|
(...) Like Tim said in his reply, if gears are snapping, it's not assembled correctly. While 8466 isn't the best drive system, it does work when assembled correctly. You should be able to push it along on the floor in any gear and it should work (...) (18 years ago, 15-Jan-07, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | French Toy Fair 2007 : pictures !
|
|
Hi, FreeLUG members were to the french Toy Fair. We wrote an article (in french) on our website (URL) Among the new sets, we can spotlight : the new electrical system with IR remote control, for the Technic bulldozer and the Creator Dino. The (...) (18 years ago, 14-Jan-07, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.year.2007, lugnet.technic, lugnet.town, lugnet.space, lugnet.castle, lugnet.starwars, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: 8466 4 X 4 HELP!!!
|
|
(...) It's not assembled correctly, I'm sorry to say. It's not the best transmission ever, but it does work. It's the same as the one in 8448. 8880 has a better design, IMO, even if it has fewer gears. Tim (18 years ago, 14-Jan-07, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | 8466 4 X 4 HELP!!!
|
|
Okay, I went to the unbelievable trouble of building my OWN set for the 8466, which is cool because i made it black and RED, with red body parts. I am having trouble with the transmission. No matter where the shifter is in position if you push the (...) (18 years ago, 14-Jan-07, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: 2007 sets: Huge RC Bulldozer and Combine Harvester
|
|
(...) take a year! It looks awesome! Why is it that us lugnetters are discovering sets later than before? The snowmobile was posted here right when it hit stores in America, yet last year the tow truck was discovered and posted many months before it (...) (18 years ago, 9-Jan-07, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: What's the difference?
|
|
Hello All, Nice and correct description, Luis. A range changer would have a ratio of 1:4 in this example. (16z/16z and 32z/8z) A Splitter would have a ratio of 1: 1.25. (16z/16z and 16z/12z) Hmm, these ratios are a little bit hard to build though... (...) (18 years ago, 8-Jan-07, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: What's the difference?
|
|
(...) Mechanically, I would think of the splitter as an additional gearbox. Using the same example Maico gave, you have a 4-speed plus reverse gearbox. The splitter would be simply an additional 2-speed gearbox. Suppose the ratios in the 4-speed (...) (18 years ago, 8-Jan-07, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 2007 sets: Huge RC Bulldozer and Combine Harvester
|
|
(...) A closer look at the upper right pic reveals that the combine harvester pretty much has all the same functions as the last "official" combine harvester model, 8862's alternate model. It DOES look better than 8862's, though. (18 years ago, 6-Jan-07, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: 2007 sets: Huge RC Bulldozer and Combine Harvester
|
|
(...) interesting. been thinking of doing one of these for a long time. (...) two new motor types? new ir receiver? -dave (18 years ago, 6-Jan-07, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: 2007 sets: Huge RC Bulldozer and Combine Harvester
|
|
And... I wanted to add that the Bulldozer seems to include lots of classic technic bricks. (18 years ago, 6-Jan-07, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | 2007 sets: Huge RC Bulldozer and Combine Harvester
|
|
8274 Combine Harvester (URL) RC Bulldozer (URL) (18 years ago, 6-Jan-07, to lugnet.technic) !
|
| |
| | Re: Mindstorms fabrication/manufacturing line...
|
|
(...) That machine is ingenious. I like the way he has his RCX bricks communicating by traveling along with the assembly line. I also like the frame he made to hold the wheels while the body was pushed onto them. Brilliant. (...) This reply is (...) (18 years ago, 5-Jan-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: What's the difference?
|
|
(...) Yes, and keep in mind that the advantage with an 18speed transmission that I described in my last post,is that you could go through your low gears without splitting them, flick into high range and split whichever gears you want...gives you (...) (18 years ago, 23-Dec-06, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: How to use this part to flip something?
|
|
(...) I realized in this picture, you can see a little more of the part in the lower left of this image. (URL) Since the part is at the core of the joint, it is hard to see it. You can see where the joint pivots, that is where the pivot point of the (...) (18 years ago, 23-Dec-06, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: How to use this part to flip something?
|
|
"Eric Sophie" <mylegomaster@aol.com> wrote in message news:JApuop.Jny@lugnet.com... (...) That's an awesome model there! Any chance you can show how you used the part in a separate image? (...) I see. Well, almost! ;-) But that's a load of eye (...) (18 years ago, 23-Dec-06, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: How to use this part to flip something?
|
|
(...) I used that part to act as the fulcrum and geared lever for the suspension on my (URL) Blue Quad>. (URL) (...) I used the part to create an shock absorb/dampen system, because the part is also used as a fulcrum, the shock returns it to (...) (18 years ago, 23-Dec-06, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | How to use this part to flip something?
|
|
(URL) been looking at this part, Technic, Arm 2 x 5 with 1/4 Gear 8 Tooth Double Bevel, and I figure it should be simple enough to use it to flip something to one side, but I'd like to know if anyone has tried doing this in a Technic creation of (...) (18 years ago, 23-Dec-06, to lugnet.technic)
|
