 | | Re: Technic question: how to connect 2 technic beams
|
|
(...) You could try a cam with an offset of 1 hole sideways along the beams - the distance between the offset holes is about 1.5L (12mm). Use the hole in the middle of the large end of the cam as well as the hole at the small end. You probably need (...) (19 years ago, 5-Oct-05, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic question: how to connect 2 technic beams
|
|
(...) Thanks for the ideas... however I am constrained to a height of 2 beams. This height restriction is what is causing me grief as I can not space the beams or add above/below to use the liftarms. Jeff (19 years ago, 5-Oct-05, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Usage of hose 3mm diameter.
|
|
(...) I tried fitting a 3mm flexible hose into a normal hose, but without success! It might be possible but would take longer than fitting a 3mm rigid flex tube into a normal hose. The 3mm hose breaks easily if it is stretched over a 3mm flex tube - (...) (19 years ago, 5-Oct-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic question: how to connect 2 technic beams
|
|
(...) If you have no plates, put four bricks on top of each other between the beams and use a 7L liftarm rather than the 5L one pictured above. Mark (19 years ago, 5-Oct-05, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Usage of hose 3mm diameter.
|
|
I'm wondering if this hose can be safely used in pneumatic switching circuits or if it's thin inside diameter would restrict airflow somewhat. I've got an idea where I might be tight on space around the valves, so I wondered to myself if 3mm hose is (...) (19 years ago, 5-Oct-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic question: how to connect 2 technic beams
|
|
(...) put the two [LDrawPart 3703] one on top of the other. On the middle of the top one put one [LDrawPart 3700], on it one [LDrawPart 3023] and on it one [LDrawPart 3700]. The hole in the top [LDrawPart 3700] can now be braced to the bottom beam (...) (19 years ago, 5-Oct-05, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Technic question: how to connect 2 technic beams
|
|
Ok... I have a question that may just show my ignorance... but I'll ask anyways. I have a need to strongly connect two technic beams (one on top of each other). Simply attaching them on top of each other (with Lego studs) is not strong enough for my (...) (19 years ago, 5-Oct-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Hex565 - one leg at at time pneumatic hexapod
|
|
(...) Sorry about the headaches..... ;^) <snip> (...) I really like the legs. <snip> (...) Ah, yes, but the volume of a cylinder is the area of the face of the cylinder times the length of the cylinder. By halving the length, we cut the total volume (...) (19 years ago, 5-Oct-05, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Hex565 - one leg at at time pneumatic hexapod
|
|
(...) I'll say! Now I also say, "I get it!" I had to stare and read pretty hard. I'll send you my advil bill. (lol) (...) Oooohhh Ya, I like that. (...) Amazing! Short vowels. (...) Still the volume of air is what counts, not the size or rather the (...) (19 years ago, 5-Oct-05, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Hex565 - one leg at at time pneumatic hexapod
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) I doodled up the four legged version. It uses 2n+1 pistons, and 5n+1 switches. As I guessed, one less switch that then hex formulas. (...) If anyone wants to see this schematic, just let me know. Kev (19 years ago, 4-Oct-05, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
