 | | Mana Cat
|
|
I'm not going to finish the Mana Cat. I rather build something else. It was interesting to test out the leg configuration with the Mana. They actually work really well. (URL) The gearing works well and is strong. The controlability is tricky and is (...) (19 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New 3-Input Multi-function Pneumatic Logic Gate
|
|
(...) Yes, R1 and R4 are redundant as shown in the table notes :-) The idea was to start with A, B and C all being either differential inputs or switch positions. The use of a switch for A means that its input is buffered to the gate output, (...) (19 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New 3-Input Multi-function Pneumatic Logic Gate
|
|
(...) I am really getting the feeling that between you guys, you are really pushing pneumatic logic generally, not just in terms of Lego. Have you thought of taking some of your Lego logic designs, and miniaturising them into blocks? Even better is (...) (19 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New 3-Input Multi-function Pneumatic Logic Gate
|
|
(...) Mark, Aren't Reversor R1 and Reversor R4 redundant? R1 can reverse the A input, which drives a piston which controls a switch, who's output is reversed by R4. I see no reason for the piston and switch between R1 and R4, unless you are just (...) (19 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New 3-Input Multi-function Pneumatic Logic Gate
|
|
(...) Hi Mark, It sounds like the swiss army knives of pneumatic logic gates! Seriously though, it is going to take some serious study on my part to understand what all is going on here. Are you putting polarity reversors on all inputs and outputs? (...) (19 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
