|
|
 | | Re: If you could wish for any single Lego element, what would it be?
|
| On Wed, April 20, 2005 2:18 pm, Rob Antonishen said: (...) That's a great start. But, it won't keep the beams from twisting (rotating) on the pins. I'd really prefer a studless version of this: (URL) (19 years ago, 20-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: If you could wish for any single Lego element, what would it be?
|
| (...) There is always this: (URL) with a few friction pins... -Rob A> (19 years ago, 20-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: If you could wish for any single Lego element, what would it be?
|
| On Wed, April 20, 2005 10:21 am, Xanthra47 said: (...) I'm not sure I totally understand what you're suggesting. Can you explain it more? When I think of a beam, I think of a straight line. If two lines (beams) actually intersect, they will be in (...) (19 years ago, 20-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: If you could wish for any single Lego element, what would it be?
|
| I'll see your two plane connector and raise you one more : ) I'd love to see "corner connectors" or "tribows" that tie 3 beams on 3 mutually orthagonal planes together in a sturdy way. Just think of what we could do in technic, if we could easily (...) (19 years ago, 20-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: If you could wish for any single Lego element, what would it be?
|
| On Wed, April 20, 2005 7:44 am, danny staple said: (...) That's called a studless beam. :) With the latest trend towards studless stuff in Technic, I'd like a way to connect two beams at 90 degrees in the same plane. Something like this part: (URL) (...) (19 years ago, 20-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
|
|
