|
|
 | | Re: About Lego Motors being a "consumable"....
|
| "Tobbe Arnesson" <StPnAtM@lotek.nu> wrote in message news:H9qI0r.L0v@lugnet.com... (...) i know but i would fall in trauma seeing this at my model :))) (...) but it would be nice to have them all stronger :) just dreaming pixel (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | new electrics
|
| hi according to lego is going to make only studless technic bricks i propose some new electric elements i suppose lego designers will make it right but the main idea is here (post moderation) (URL) links) (URL) know lego politics is to not use (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: new 2003 sets
|
| (...) I agree, that truck is cool and I'm actually going to have to go out and buy a NEW Lego set (The backhoe), at full price, haven't done that in a long while. So much for those doom mongers who said Technic was dead. Well done Lego. Steve (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam)
| | | | | Re: About Lego Motors being a "consumable"....
|
| *trimmed lugnet.robotics* (...) That was easy, wait 'til I get my page on broken LEGO up :) (...) I suppose you refer to the ones made by Bram: (URL)let's say just liftarms (not bricks) (...) I think axels and gears are of a higher priority. However (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: new 2003 sets
|
| (...) I don't think it was leaked but YAY! Oh, and the Backhoe is still nice :) /Tobbe (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam)
|
|
