 | | Re: At-St
|
| Why couldn't lego give us THIS at-st instead of what they gave us! WHY! WHY! WHY! (...) (24 years ago, 8-Nov-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: At-St
|
| (...) Because from the look of it, it would have been at a price point that would clash with the Imperial Shuttle. Try to keep in mind that LEGO actually has to have sets in each theme-year's offerings that meet certain price points. That said, (...) (24 years ago, 8-Nov-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: At-St
|
| But I want to whine, whine, whine and perhaps the LEGO fariy will hear our whines and do something the next time around. =) I know LEGOs are for kids and I can built my own, but I don't want to be bother having to look for the pieces (buying from (...) (24 years ago, 8-Nov-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: At-St
|
| (...) Mabie they will, calling it a UCS at-st. (24 years ago, 8-Nov-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: At-St
|
| (...) If you look closely at the leg assembly for the AT-ST, you'll notice that it has a non-LEGO flexible-like element to support it. This probably makes it somewhat useless as a set model... Fredrik (24 years ago, 13-Nov-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| |
