 | | Re: New Stormtroopers —Daniel Crichton
|
| | | "Matt Penney" <glister5454@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:G2wDG7.K4q@lugnet.com... (...) Looks like it! I'm up for 2 Tie Fighters when they come in just so I can build an Interceptor out of one of them (got a great Interceptor MOC DAT, just need a (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: New Stormtroopers —Daniel Crichton
|
| | | | "Daniel Crichton" <danielc@helio.co.uk> wrote in message news:G2wDKo.KMn@lugnet.com... (...) Oh yeah, that'll mean that I have a spare shuttle as it looks like the Tie fighter and Imperial shuttle are part of the same set (like the Y-Wing and (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New Stormtroopers —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | | Nope. If you scroll further down the page, you'll note that there is a separate set # next to each. ~Mark (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New Stormtroopers —Eric Kingsley
|
| | | | | (...) their own set numbers. Eric Kingsley The New England LEGO Users Group (URL) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New Stormtroopers —Daniel Crichton
|
| | | | "Daniel Crichton" <danielc@helio.co.uk> wrote in message news:G2wE32.MEJ@lugnet.com... (...) DAT, (...) the (...) 2 (...) my largest app, and I've just taken a much closer look at the picture and noticed the Tie and the shuttle have different set (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
