 | | Re: Why we won't see the Emperor... —Eric Joslin
|
| | | (...) Now *this* is an amazingly cool idea! Even taken out of the context of the bucket, it would be cool if they made a set that had Han and all his various clothes and accessories, etc. eric (24 years ago, 29-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Why we won't see the Emperor... —Shiri Dori
|
| | | | (...) Heh. Barbie Han, anyone? <evil grin> -Shiri (24 years ago, 30-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Why we won't see the Emperor... —Ravi Mohan
|
| | | | (...) Ok write 'Han is not Ken' 100 times on the notice board shiri ;-) (24 years ago, 30-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Why we won't see the Emperor... —Alan Gerber
|
| | | | (...) Not too much of a punishment in the digital era with cut + paste, you know. Alan (24 years ago, 30-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Why we won't see the Emperor... —Kyle Henneberque
|
| | | | (...) various (...) And I thought, gee, I could get away from hearing about stupid Barbie dolls if I get into Lego. Besides, if Shiri numbers those, the cut and paste won't work. Kyle (24 years ago, 1-Jul-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Why we won't see the Emperor... —Ran Talbott
|
| | | | (...) gawk 'BEGIN {for (i = 1; i < 101; i++) print i, "Han is not Ken" }' (24 years ago, 1-Jul-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
