 | | Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? —James Wilson
|
| | | In lugnet.starwars, Matthew Wilkins writes: (completely taken out of context) (...) Nor would I wish to!!! :) James (24 years ago, 2-Feb-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? —Matthew Wilkins
|
| | | | | (...) Thanks, I was trying to come up with a metaphor that wouldn't offend rabid animal lovers. *grin* -Cheese (24 years ago, 2-Feb-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? —Franklin W. Cain
|
| | | | | | (...) I guess you could say I love animals. . . . Some of my best meals were animals. [ducking for cover] Franklin (24 years ago, 2-Feb-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | (...) At least it's not the other variant, which involves swinging a dead cat. best, LFB (24 years ago, 2-Feb-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Star Wars a loss for Lego? —Matthew Wilkins
|
| | | | This was my first choice, which I felt was a tad odious for a 'family' forum. *grin* -Cheese (...) (24 years ago, 2-Feb-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
