 | | Re: Some inside info on 2000 SW Lego... —Greg Majewski
|
| | | (...) I'm thinkin' that the one and only Chewbacca of the entire series will be in the MF, so people will have to spend 100+ bucks to get one, but then again, that would be an awesome set, so people would buy it anyway. Greg citrusx__@yahoo.com (URL) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Some inside info on 2000 SW Lego... —Pat Justison
|
| | | | | (...) Two things. The Slave 1 is not a very easy ship to design well with Legos. I should know, I've been working on one for a few months now. I'm not convinced that there will be an official Slave1. I'm also a little scared that if it is made it (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Some inside info on 2000 SW Lego... —John VanZwieten
|
| | | | | | Pat Justison <ra6282@email.sps.mot.com> wrote in message news:FE75DI.8tu@lugnet.com... (...) I (...) convinced (...) is (...) They'll likely need special curved large pieces for the MF, too? I don't think that will stop them, though. (...) ones (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Some inside info on 2000 SW Lego... —Jason Fabisch
|
| | | | | | I am still getting that eerie feeling that the back of the MF could be made from the exact back of the arachnoid starbase. EEEeeepppp. That would make it roughly 1 foot wide and use a couple hundred pieces to make up the front end. Then the back (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Some inside info on 2000 SW Lego... —John Rudy
|
| | | | Has anyone thought about the supposed star wars bucket, it is listed at www.lugnet.com/pause search: Star wars bucket (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
