 | | Re: Some inside info on 2000 SW Lego...
|
|
(...) Have we been posting to lugnet.cad.dat.* again? ;) For smaller sets, how about an Ewok target range? "Here, Wicket. Take this apple, go stand over at the far end of the lane, and put the apple on your head. Now hold still..." Maybe there won't (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Some inside info on 2000 SW Lego...
|
|
(...) I'm thinkin' that the one and only Chewbacca of the entire series will be in the MF, so people will have to spend 100+ bucks to get one, but then again, that would be an awesome set, so people would buy it anyway. Greg citrusx__@yahoo.com (URL) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Some inside info on 2000 SW Lego...
|
|
(...) Two things. The Slave 1 is not a very easy ship to design well with Legos. I should know, I've been working on one for a few months now. I'm not convinced that there will be an official Slave1. I'm also a little scared that if it is made it (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Some inside info on 2000 SW Lego...
|
|
Pat Justison <ra6282@email.sps.mot.com> wrote in message news:FE75DI.8tu@lugnet.com... (...) I (...) convinced (...) is (...) They'll likely need special curved large pieces for the MF, too? I don't think that will stop them, though. (...) ones (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Some inside info on 2000 SW Lego...
|
|
Has anyone thought about the supposed star wars bucket, it is listed at www.lugnet.com/pause search: Star wars bucket (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Some inside info on 2000 SW Lego...
|
|
I am still getting that eerie feeling that the back of the MF could be made from the exact back of the arachnoid starbase. EEEeeepppp. That would make it roughly 1 foot wide and use a couple hundred pieces to make up the front end. Then the back (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
