 | | Re: Jar Jar will probably be back
|
|
(...) Menace the Trade Feds might be, but phantoms they are not. Out in the open, they are. (1) And the attack was a ploy on Palpatines part, for sure. And at the very end, all seems well with the Republic, except for the phantom menace of the Sith, (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Jar Jar will probably be back
|
|
(...) <Dragonelf1@aol.com> wrote: (...) Palpatine and his (...) attack on Naboo was (...) Trade (...) Yoda) think (...) in the open, (...) the very end, (...) of the Sith, in (...) Ah, Terry you shoulda said "Yoda-speak seem I to be using" :) Ryan (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Jar Jar will probably be back
|
|
(...) Nah, that is what I (don't) pay you for. Fixing my mistakes. :-) -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Jar Jar will probably be back
|
|
(...) Ah, but something out in the open can still be a 'phantom'. A phantom is 'something existing in perception only', and the Sith are a very real menace. The Naboo thought the Trade Federation was the threat to them and the republic, so the (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Jar Jar will probably be back
|
|
(...) So you're saying George could have called this movie "The Feint"? Steve (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Jar Jar will probably be back
|
|
(...) republic, (...) Sure. Of course, it is his movie, so he could've called it anything just about anything. :) Jeff (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Jar Jar will probably be back
|
|
some spoiler below..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (...) Ah... but it's not! Part of the purpose of this movie was to demonstrate how ineffective and weak the Republic was. This was wonderfully shown in the Senate Chamber (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
