 | | Re: Question about 7128? —Brent Curtis
| | | | (...) me (...) If I had to speculate and go way out on a limb (and a wishing star), I'd say that it was given that number to designate it as a ROTJ set. Since ROTJ saw the introduction of many new vehicles (skiffs, a-wings, b-wings, tie (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Question about 7128? —Eric Kingsley
| | | | | (...) Snip (...) I like this theory best. (...) Bigger hopefully, better I don't know. These are the best models I have seen from TLG in a long time (except maybe the Sith Infiltrator but still great for parts) and to hope for better is asking a (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Question about 7128? —Jeff Stembel
| | | | | (...) I like number 3, but I think the second part of number 1 (they didn't have a ROTJ set) is what happened. Maybe it was supposed to come out next year, and we'll see a bunch of 71X8 sets, along with 7120. ;) Jeff (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | | |
