Subject:
|
Re: Why the Star Wars license isn't always good for builders
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Mon, 8 Sep 2008 00:46:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
20563 times
|
| |
|
|
I have to agree with Adrian on this one. If you’d wanted those parts, you could
have bought up on the set, and then sold off the parts you didn’t want.
I think the parts are expensive because they only appeared once, there were only
3 of them in a 698-piece set, that set was a S@H exclusive from 5 years ago, and
because they are really useful.
I haven’t analyzed the Cloud City parts inventory, but I’d be surprised if the
parts-prices aren’t directly tied to how common the parts are.
OTOH, I certainly understand the frustration of wanting a specific part, knowing
it’s available, but not being able to justify the purchase price. In some ways,
that’s more frustrating than wanting parts that LEGO never made...
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Why the Star Wars license isn't always good for builders
|
| It's entirely possible that this particular equine corpse has been beaten so many times that you could read newsprint through it, but I have to get this out. If it's already been discussed ad nauseum, please just move on. After browsing Bricklink (...) (16 years ago, 7-Sep-08, to lugnet.starwars, FTX)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
