 | | Re: Modifying your AT-AT set
|
|
(...) I followed you clear and concise instructions with extra parts that weren't in existing mocs and the results were beautiful. The whole upgrade was complete in a 1/2 hour guy...1/2 hour! I'm looking forward to your mod for Lego's upcoming "mini (...) (21 years ago, 19-May-03, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Look, sir, droids --- new diorama
|
|
(...) Thanks AC. I had made the dewback design a while back for my SW 1592 variation: (URL) this model was basically an exercise in stacking tan plates. Bruce (21 years ago, 19-May-03, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Modifying your AT-AT set
|
|
(...) Quote from DaveE's link: "Therefore, we must tweak the body design just slightly by completely rebuilding it." DaveE, you are not doing a modification, you have completely built a new model using quite a lot of parts. That ain't quick or easy, (...) (21 years ago, 19-May-03, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Modifying your AT-AT set
|
|
Dude, I really wish LEGO would have used yours instead. It's much more in proportion, and honestly a better design. Of course, that didn't stop me from buying two from LEGO :) -Anne (...) -- I get plenty of exercise- jumping (\`--/') _ _______ .-r-. (...) (21 years ago, 19-May-03, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: AT-AT online at S@H
|
|
(...) So you must find color schemes like this to be quite annoying. (wink) (URL) B. (21 years ago, 19-May-03, to lugnet.starwars)
|
