 | | Re: Scans Ready: Star Wars, Rock Raiders, and other 1999 sets. —Jesse Long
| | | | Selçuk wrote in message <363AA346.2B0D79C5@n...ne.com>... (...) I didn't think that he might have been looking at that one. I don't like it. The Y-Wing and T.I.E. Fighter look pretty good, but the Snow Speeder doesn't. Too small. Jesse ___...___ (...) (26 years ago, 31-Oct-98, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Scans Ready: Star Wars, Rock Raiders, and other 1999 sets. —Selçuk Göre
| | | | | Snowspeeder is originally small vehicle already. It has less than Half of the Length of X-wing, according to the blue prints of Hoth Base hangar from the SW Technical Journal. It looks just OK (if it has a place at cockpit back for a second (...) (26 years ago, 31-Oct-98, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Scans Ready: Star Wars, Rock Raiders, and other 1999 sets. —Jesse Long
| | | | | Selçuk wrote in message <363B175D.EA10FFA5@n...ne.com>... (...) the (...) SW (...) a (...) But this might suggest that, for the first time in Lego and SW toy history, people are actually taking into account scale. The Snow Speeder is small, the (...) (26 years ago, 31-Oct-98, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Scans Ready: Star Wars, Rock Raiders, and other 1999 sets. —Lee Jorgensen
| | | | | (...) At that rate, how big would a Death Star be? Lotsa grey legos ... :) -Lee. (26 years ago, 2-Nov-98, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Scans Ready: Star Wars, Rock Raiders, and other 1999 sets. —Steve Bliss
| | | | | (...) 6x6x4 - not coincidentally, the same size as the boulder in Boulder Cliff Canyon... Steve (26 years ago, 3-Nov-98, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | | |
