 | | Re: Could TLG Answer our prayers?...A Millenium Falcon
|
|
You know, I've always wondered why I like RotJ the least of the trilogy, and I think you've hit it! Just think if half the movie was used attacking the 2nd Death Star. -John Van Steve Bliss wrote in message <371c7e1a.2609035@lu...et.com>... (...) (26 years ago, 20-Apr-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Could TLG Answer our prayers?...A Millenium Falcon
|
|
(...) :) Nah, that would have been too too derivative (having another Death Star was already too derivative). What if they had taken the Death Star planet-killer weapon, and put it on a *much* smaller platform (instead of an even bigger platform)? (...) (26 years ago, 20-Apr-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Could TLG Answer our prayers?...A Millenium Falcon
|
|
(...) I (...) I whole heartedly agree. How come the Ewoks got there own movie but no other cooler aliens did? (...) (26 years ago, 21-Apr-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Could TLG Answer our prayers?...A Millenium Falcon
|
|
Would you guys stop picking on the Ewoks :) Wicket was my second favorite character. They got 1/2 of a movie because George Lucas wanted to give them 1/2 the movie, duh :) Ryan "Build or build not. There is no try." - Lego Master Yoda ***...*** (...) (26 years ago, 21-Apr-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Could TLG Answer our prayers?...A Millenium Falcon
|
|
(...) Then everybody could have sat around celebrating and eating fried Ewok. A universally known delicacy. -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 21-Apr-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Could TLG Answer our prayers?...A Millenium Falcon
|
|
I think RotJ was the least appreciated because of the perception that the series had done a cardinal sin by trying to be "cute". The Ewoks were just to cute, something I hate to see in a good movie. Taking the series as a whole, the presence of the (...) (26 years ago, 21-Apr-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Could TLG Answer our prayers?...A Millenium Falcon
|
|
Terry K wrote in message <371d72ba.4919104@lu...et.com>... (...) just to (...) whole, (...) So what makes people think that TPM, which stars a child for crying out loud, isn't going to be just as cute and lame? Jesse ___...___ Jesse The Jolly (...) (26 years ago, 21-Apr-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Could TLG Answer our prayers?...A Millenium Falcon
|
|
(...) A very valid question. One can only hope. But one boy thrust into the center of galactic events could be a subject handled without reverting to being cute. I hope so, anyway. The Ewoks, on the other hand, were primarily portrayed as being cute (...) (26 years ago, 22-Apr-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Could TLG Answer our prayers?...A Millenium Falcon
|
|
(...) Very true. Interesting that the second trailer barely mentions Anakin (I hate when movies change advertising, and make themselves look like an entirely different movie!). (...) Plus, there's the hokey plot-line problem. Natives discover white (...) (26 years ago, 22-Apr-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Could TLG Answer our prayers?...A Millenium Falcon
|
|
(...) I hate when the movie trailers are better than the movie. Or when they give away what should be a pivotal plot point in the movie. I *HATE* knowing what is going to happen from seeing the stupid preview. (go ahead and insert Titanic sinking (...) (26 years ago, 22-Apr-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Could TLG Answer our prayers?...A Millenium Falcon
|
|
(...) Forgot to mention the most insipid part of it: Chewie being fooled by a hunk of dead meat on a line. And the entire crew being hoist by a snare. Steve (26 years ago, 23-Apr-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Could TLG Answer our prayers?...A Millenium Falcon
|
|
(...) Ouch! Ouch! OK! I give up! Uncle! -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 24-Apr-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
