 | | Re: Yet more new slopes appearing in 2003 SW? —Geoffrey Hyde
|
| | | (...) I hate to put out your enthusiasm's fire but ... (URL) think this is that piece, there doesn't appear to be a seam on the long side, just on the short side. (...) Don't get your hopes up - although I do wish they'd bring out a nice (...) (22 years ago, 9-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Yet more new slopes appearing in 2003 SW? —Matt Sekerak
|
| | | | | (...) I called my bookie in Vegas...odds are 10 to 1 that it's a new slope. Bets are on....=) -Matt (22 years ago, 9-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Yet more new slopes appearing in 2003 SW? —Geoffrey Hyde
|
| | | | | | "Matt Sekerak" <matthew.sekerak@verizon.net> wrote in message news:H5BEDn.GAu@lugnet.com... (...) I'm afraid not! The Government would want it's 10% GST, either way! Looking at it again, it would seem I might have to reverse my earlier assessment (...) (22 years ago, 9-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Yet more new slopes appearing in 2003 SW? —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | (...) Nah, if you look at that box, it's pretty clear that the facet is not two studs wide, it's only *one*. Then there's a two-stud gap, and finally a second one-stud facet for the opposing "half-6069" piece. There's no way it could really be the (...) (22 years ago, 9-Nov-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
