Subject:
|
7153 Jango Fett's Slave I: Fig Pictures
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Sat, 23 Mar 2002 18:41:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
821 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Mark Sandlin writes:
> In article <GtEJrA.Cx8@lugnet.com>, "Mr L F Braun"
> <braunli1@pilot.msu.edu> wrote:
>
> > As promised:
> >
> > http://www.msu.edu/user/braunli1/new7153parts.jpg
> >
> > And the box:
> >
> > http://www.msu.edu/user/braunli1/7153f.jpg
> > http://www.msu.edu/user/braunli1/7153b.jpg
>
> Looks like some interesting new parts. Can't wait to get my hands on those. :^)
(Believe me, I thought about parting the other two out--I may yet do it.)
Well, here are the figs:
http://www.msu.edu/user/braunli1/jangofig.jpg
http://www.msu.edu/user/braunli1/bobafig.jpg
http://www.msu.edu/user/braunli1/jangopack.jpg
Yes, it's still a one-piece jetpack.
> The wings on the model look really weak. They should have more greebles on
> the technic bits used to connect them to the fuselage.
I agree. Most of the model could use more greeblies, and they need to
close the area right under the "nose" (in the rested position, it's below).
There are also two small gaps between the body and the canopy, and the
cockpit's "rotation" makes the cargo pod shake (and there's no way to
"lock" the rotation). However, I think the wing issue is part of keeping
the center of gravity unmistakably low--without the wings, the cockpit
section could flop either way. This way, gravity dictates rotation.
The manual has no cartoons in it, alas.
best
LFB
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
4 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
