 | | Re: Opinion on 2001 sets —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | (...) I don't personally care for the looks of the AT-ST, but I have bought four of them for the parts. Parts I like: -1x2 plate with click-hinge joint -New cylindrical click-hinge extensions -decorated 2x2 round tiles -gray canopy extension -dk (...) (24 years ago, 18-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Opinion on 2001 sets —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) **snip of parts Mark likes** I'm also quite favorably disposed to the 1x4 brick with 4 side studs, not to mention the inverted 2x2 slope with viewscreen. Dave! (24 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Opinion on 2001 sets —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | (...) The 1x4 is nice, but I find the viewscreen kind of annoying because it isn't nonspecific enough to use in any MOC. You'd have to use it in something that's attacking an AT-ST. ;^) ~Mark "Muffin Head" Sandlin (24 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Opinion on 2001 sets —Eric Joslin
|
| | | | (...) Well, I'd agree that it can only be used in certain SW MOCs. You could use it in an Imperial Base, for example, checking on the progress of a partol or something. eric (24 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
