|
|
 | | Bubble Tech. Revealed!
|
| (...) Continually laying bubble. I like it! (...) Ah, well, let's see here. I believe my "tech guys" in the R&D department came up with quite an astounding breakthrough as far bubble technology goes. The bubbles are made from a mixture of (...) (20 years ago, 20-May-04, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Tri-Wing Fighter Redux
|
| (...) Uh-oh! So, um, can I avoid the fish if I testify that I (URL) wasn't really> um (URL) explaining> um (URL) anything at all...>? I suggest that the practice of posting further explanations that obfuscate rather than clarify, utilize Junior (...) (20 years ago, 20-May-04, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Tri-Wing Fighter Redux
|
| (...) I'll just have to make a bubble tender MOC that exceeds the word count then. It shouldn't be to hard. ~Clangador (20 years ago, 20-May-04, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
| | | | | Re: Tri-Wing Fighter Redux
|
| (...) I think I may love you. (URL) [ j o n ] (URL) zemi.net> (URL) moonbase> (URL) myspace> (20 years ago, 20-May-04, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Tri-Wing Fighter Redux
|
| (...) I propose a new rule: If the word count in explaining whatever contrived technology is required for a moc to work exceeds the piece count of said moc, then the builder gets slapped upside the head with a fish. <slap> <>< (20 years ago, 20-May-04, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
|
