|
|
 | | Re: Trademark infringement by LEGO and Lucasfilm?
|
| (...) Actually, according to starwars.com the name is "GNK droid"... (URL) the paper you have actuall say 'Gonk' or was it 'GNK'? If it was a Lego paper that said "Gonk" then the litigation would be directed towards Lego, since starwars.com does not (...) (22 years ago, 29-Dec-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)
| | | | | MOC: Rebel Laser Cannon (Hoth)
|
| Hey guys, Sorry I've been away for a while; my computer decided to not work for me for almost a fortnight... I figured I'd try my round at a Rebel Laser Cannon with some ideas I've been holding onto for a while and now new non-webbed 6x6 radar (...) (22 years ago, 28-Dec-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.build, lugnet.space) !
| | | | | Re: Review of 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
|
| (...) Agreed. While the magnet idea is cool, it is simply not strong enough. Even Though the magnets do not take all the strain, they still tend to slip and disconnect. For the most part, I didn't have much trouble, but when I began putting any (...) (22 years ago, 28-Dec-02, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Sneak Preview Of Diorama
|
| Something to greet the coming year with! (URL) & Sons (22 years ago, 28-Dec-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.build)
| | | | | Re: Review of 10030 Imperial Star Destroyer
|
| Kerry, your review was most thorough! I do not have the time nor the patience to type an equally thorough response. However, I respond just hours after completing my own ISD...I must say you are being too critical of the model's integrity. I would (...) (22 years ago, 28-Dec-02, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.loc.au)
|
|
