 | | Re: how large would the ISD be compared to the Enterprise-D?
|
|
(...) My favorite line from "Stand by Me" (Other than "S*** my fat one, you cheap dime-store hood!" James (22 years ago, 16-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: how large would the ISD be compared to the Enterprise-D?
|
|
(...) A little bit longer, no more than a 50 foot difference in length. (...) Actually, if you can find the book The Making of Star Trek, there is a diagram that is a size comparison. Turns out that the TV Enterprise was about as long at the (...) (22 years ago, 16-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: how large would the ISD be compared to the Enterprise-D?
|
|
(...) Hm, I thought that Enterprise-D was 2000 ft long, as the original ship was in the 950 ft length (Enterprise-A went to 1000 feet), and D was supposed to be twice and long and twice as high. My thought is that Enterprise-D would be smaller to (...) (22 years ago, 16-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: how large would the ISD be compared to the Enterprise-D?
|
|
(...) USS Enterprise NCC-1701: 289 Meters USS Enterprise NCC-1701A: 305 Meters USS Enterprise NCC-1701B: 467 Meters USS Enterprise NCC-1701C: 526 Meters USS Enterprise NCC-1701D: 641 Meters USS Enterprise NCC-1701E: 700 Meters USS Enterprise CV-6 (...) (22 years ago, 16-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: how large would the ISD be compared to the Enterprise-D?
|
|
(...) IIRC, I saw an overlay of the top view of 1701-D on the modern Enterprise aircraft carrier--they were the same length--front of saucer to back of nacelle is the same length as bow to stern. 1701-D was somewhat wider than the aircraft carrier, (...) (22 years ago, 16-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
