|
|
 | | Re: TLG and "Seeding"
|
| (...) Granted, SW is a bird of a different feather. We're all well aware that it's by and large a return to old-school construction. Two points on this matter: 1) The X-Wing pretty much required new elements (engines, canopy, perhaps wings). Had it (...) (25 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: Endor Shield Generator
|
| (...) It looks awesome! You've definitely captured the feel right out of the movie. Now, if we could just construct the giant dish... Sean (25 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: TLG and "Seeding"
|
| (...) In this discussion the Star Wars sets have been generally regarded as exceptions to the rule. Your 673 example is more on target but still overlooks the dreadful state of design in more recent Lego sets. Compare, for example, set (URL) from (...) (25 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: TLG and "Seeding"
|
| (...) I don't want to sound too personally critical, but are you being serious? Sets like King Leo's Castle are more sophisticated than things like King's Castle? Or how about the 1998 Cargo Center compared to the 1984 model? And as for idea books, (...) (25 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: TLG and "Seeding"
|
| (...) Are you sure about that? Since this thread goes on .starwars, lets take the X-Wing as an example. Could such a realistic looking X-Wing be constructed with the part selection as of 15 or 20 year ago? I would say probably not. The fairly new (...) (25 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars)
|
|
