 | | Re: UCS Inspired Minifig Scale T-65 X-Wing
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) My thanks to both of you for pointing this out. I found a few pairs on Brickbay. They will come in handy...somewhere (or at least, that's what I keep telling myself to justify all the rest of the lego parts I've collected over the (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Technic C-3P0: My First Impression
|
|
Yesterday I saw boxes of 8008, the Technic Stormtrooper, at the nearby TRU. I bought one, and when I opened the box, surpringly I found not a Stormtrooper, but a 8007 C-3P0 inside. No matter. I like C-3P0, too. After I built it, sadly I must say the (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars Technic C-3PO & Stormtrooper
|
|
(...) I guess I'm going shopping tomorrow!!! Joe (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Who else wants an AT-AT?
|
|
(...) Hey All, I don't want to sound rude but why not avoid the "argument" and confusion. I haven't read all of this conversation but according to my blueprints the AT-AT is 15.5 meters equaling 50.8524 feet. Why not just go with 50 feet? Joe (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Who else wants an AT-AT?
|
|
(...) <fanatic level=almost_there> Very true. There's a lot to consider :) There are a couple key scenes to derive the AT-AT's actual height. 1. Luke ascending to the underbelly (there's a shot available on www.starwars.com) 2. The foot trampling (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
