 | | Re: Bram Lambrecht 's spaceplane —Trevor Pruden
|
| | | (...) <snip> Good point. And you're right - it's between Jon and Bram. But it's funny because this is essentially a pleasure transport/A to B plane. So does that classify it as a capital? So what classifies a capital anyway? I have an image in my (...) (23 years ago, 29-May-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Bram Lambrecht 's spaceplane —Mladen Pejic
|
| | | | | (...) a (...) Why? (...) be (...) Yeah... hmmm... interesting... ;-) (...) Of course! Ever bothered to check out the actual webpage?! ;-) "Valour" AG: (URL) this little red text underneath the title which say: _Download .DAT File_. [hears Trevor (...) (23 years ago, 29-May-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Bram Lambrecht 's spaceplane —Trevor Pruden
|
| | | | | | (...) [slap!] (23 years ago, 29-May-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Bram Lambrecht 's spaceplane —Wayne R. Hussey
|
| | | | (...) I think that to "qualify" for "Capital Ship" not only requires size and function, but also time. Your example of 747 vs aircraft carrier is a good one in this relationship. A 747 can stay aloft for about 12 hours - maybe a bit more - end of (...) (23 years ago, 29-May-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
