Subject:
|
Re: Two new MOCS
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 16:50:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1629 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Norman Mensing writes:
>
> Looks nice. To me the middle fuselage looks a bit too light / short compared
> to the "wings". On the other hand if you make it longer, it might not look
> that "clawish" anymore...
I actually toyed with a longer fuselage but it just didn't look right to me.
I also tried a thicker fuselage but that made it look stubby. I kind of
liked the idea of the light somewhat vulnerable looking fuselage protected
by the large heavily armored wings, so I stuck with it.
> And how about adding two 1x3x1-22,5°slopes behind the front weapons so they
> merge better with the hull (does that make sense?)
> Apart from that - cool model, and nice matching name.
>
> -Norman
I think I can visualize what you're saying and I think that would improve
the look a bit... I'll have to experiment with it. Thanks!
As to the name, that actually took longer to come up with than the model
took to build... <G> I sat down with about five MOCs in front of me and
decided to name each one. After naming the other four my mind was a blank
for this one. Three days of on and off thinking later it popped into my
head as I was trying to fall asleep... :)
-Bryan
hobartrus@hotmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/hobartrus/index.html
http://brickshelf.com/gallery/hobartrus
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Two new MOCS
|
| "Bryan Hodges" <bhodges@SPAMBLOCKco...ntweb.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:G8wzMz.Grv@lugnet.com... (...) Looks nice. To me the middle fuselage looks a bit too light / short compared to the "wings". On the other hand if you make it longer, it (...) (26 years ago, 20-Feb-01, to lugnet.space)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
