Subject:
|
Re: right.....IM BACk
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Wed, 1 Dec 1999 05:28:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
520 times
|
| |
|
|
Felix Greco wrote:
> I feel your pain my friend. You asked a genuine space related building
> question and no one has any input. I would venture to think the reason is
> because they all build wimpy little fighters :) Sure, we could all smack a few
> pieces underneath a prefabricated cockpit piece... but thats easy. The true
> challenge of space Legos is building big engined, big gunned, and big crewed
> ships that drain your whole collection. But enough antagonism.
>
> If I were in your situation I'd use 4 by 6 plates. That way you can smack on
> smaller pieces to give it detail. It can hinge any number of ways. What do
> you think?
>
> Felix Greco
>
> http://member.aol.com/felixisgr8/lego_page.html
I have created a large ship in ldraw, thee grumman aerpsoace f2000 juggernaut. It
is so massive that it is well nigh impossible to build. It also uses lots of parts
in colors that they do not exist in (for example clear orange aquazone windscreens
and domes)
--
Jonathan Wilson
wilsonj@xoommail.com
http://members.xoom.com/wilsonj/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: right.....IM BACk
|
| I feel your pain my friend. You asked a genuine space related building question and no one has any input. I would venture to think the reason is because they all build wimpy little fighters :) Sure, we could all smack a few pieces underneath a (...) (25 years ago, 1-Dec-99, to lugnet.space)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
