| | Re: The "geography" of local space Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | (...) Apparently they actually got occlusion readings from a near star in the last week--by "near" I'm talking ~40pc. I can find the article and the star name, but it's one of the HDs (that narrows it down to several hundred thousand objects....;) (...) (25 years ago, 17-Nov-99, to lugnet.space)
|
| | |
| | | | Re: The "geography" of local space John J. Ladasky, Jr.
|
| | | | This thread just keeps going and going! (...) Right. Lindsay is referring to HD 209458. Catchy name, huh? 8^) The Doppler shift research team that I mentioned in an earlier post predicted that HD 209458 has a planetary companion. The object is (...) (25 years ago, 20-Nov-99, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The "geography" of local space Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | (...) Hey, it's a good thread. (...) Dangnab frickin' frackin' million-and-fifty-two catalogues... (...) Nice incitation effect there. It does seem that an intensity change of over 1.5% ought to be detectable again! Given (as you said) that a (...) (25 years ago, 22-Nov-99, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The "geography" of local space John J. Ladasky, Jr.
|
| | | | Greetings, Earthilings. (...) At least there's a pretty well-done on-line cross reference to the common catalogs now. Paul Baulch was kind enough start me down the road to finding this. I know that I mentioned it before, but here's the URL again for (...) (25 years ago, 23-Nov-99, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |