Subject:
|
Re: Bigger Engines/Sloped Cone elements
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space, lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Sun, 29 Oct 2000 00:25:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1046 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Richard Marchetti writes:
> Hey Y'all, and welcome to another episode of "Wishes in Vain."
>
> So I am looking at my cone rocket segments and thinking, "Cool, I have an
> antennae up top followed by a 2x2 based cone with a single stud on top (x2
> high), followed by a 4x4 based cone with 4 studs on top (x2 high), followed
> by a...?"
>
> Yeah, this is the element I am looking for and wondering if TLC ever
> manufactured in any color. I guess it would be a 6x6 based cone segment
> with 12 studs on top (x2 high). I could really dig some of these in black,
> red, grey, blue, and yellow.
>
> What say you space and castle fans -- would there be any point to these, or
> am I the only one who sees it?
I'd find an 8x8x4 cone more useful. There isn't a good option for a 6x6
cylinder, but 8x8 cylinders can be done with the quarter circle bricks or the
new curved wall pieces from the 2001 sets. Of course it would be just peachy if
TLC decided to release 6x6 circle elements...
An 8x8 cone would also be just the right size for a conical roof on a 6x6
octagonal tower.
Frank
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Bigger Engines/Sloped Cone elements
|
| Hey Y'all, and welcome to another episode of "Wishes in Vain." So I am looking at my cone rocket segments and thinking, "Cool, I have an antennae up top followed by a 2x2 based cone with a single stud on top (x2 high), followed by a 4x4 based cone (...) (24 years ago, 28-Oct-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.castle)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
