 | | Re: The "geography" of local space —Paul Baulch
|
| | | John J. Ladasky Jr. wrote in message <3822B586.38355581@m...ja.com>... (...) Hipparcos (...) 10 (...) that (...) many (...) that (...) on (...) local (...) What it does do, however, is give a link to the VizieR service that I found a couple of (...) (25 years ago, 7-Nov-99, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The "geography" of local space —John J. Ladasky, Jr.
|
| | | | (...) I just had a look at this. Cool! This is the query engine that seemed so obvious to have, that I hoped would exist, but which was somehow missing from the main Hipparcos pages. I can see that the catalog contains some errors that have been (...) (25 years ago, 7-Nov-99, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The "geography" of local space —Paul Baulch
|
| | | | John J. Ladasky Jr. wrote in message <3825442B.5A4DD282@m...ja.com>... (...) for (...) database (...) I'm (...) for (...) Well, what can I say, but: 1) This was two years ago on a machine with 32meg of memory and a version of Nutscrape that crashed (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The "geography" of local space —John J. Ladasky, Jr.
|
| | | | Hi, Paul, (...) Trust me, Stanford has THOUSANDS of computers other than mine to worry about! Oh, and it's not my personal workstation, though I handle most of its technical operation. We have about one computer per two people in our research group. (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The "geography" of local space —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | | (...) Whoa! Citation! Can I send this one to tthe Humanities Index? (>Insert the noise of a CV being violently padded here<) (...) Absolutely. Maybe it makes us feel a little closer to reality, like we're not just playing deities but playing (...) (25 years ago, 13-Nov-99, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The "geography" of local space —Paul Baulch
|
| | | | John J. Ladasky Jr. wrote in message <382802B2.3FE87E39@m...ja.com>... (...) would (...) minus (...) than (...) _much_ (...) its (...) on (...) John, it's certainly a very good theory. After considering what you say, I think that I would consider (...) (25 years ago, 14-Nov-99, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
