 | | Re: 3vil Battleship Azazel —Tony Hafner
| | | | (...) Apparently 3vil isn't either, 'cause then it would have to be "3\/1|_" or something equally stupid[1]. Proper 1337-speak is nigh illegible to the vast bulk of the population, and as a graphic designer you obviously know that to market a name (...) (20 years ago, 5-Aug-04, to lugnet.space)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: 3vil Battleship Azazel —Matthew Sklar
| | | | | (...) I've sparked quite the (little) argument here! And it's only my, what, 10th post? Not even? I think Tony has a point here, 3GA, 3vil can't quite consider themselves 1337 just by useing the 1337-5p34k "e". (I'm a gamer, and I'm quite 1337, (...) (20 years ago, 5-Aug-04, to lugnet.space)
| | | | | | |
