 | | Re: New MOC: deep-space exploration SHIP "Beagle"
|
|
(...) Well it doesn't feel boxy to me until my eye gets right up to that front area where the corners poke out. Hey, what if you put the big Comm dish on the front? Just a thought. -Grand Admiral .space Curator (URL) (22 years ago, 2-Dec-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: deep-space exploration SHIP "Beagle"
|
|
(...) Maybe. I was going for a Y-wing kind of look, where the covers have been removed to facilitate maintenance. And I think they look cool, so why not shw 'em off? :-) (...) Thanks! (22 years ago, 2-Dec-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: deep-space exploration SHIP "Beagle"
|
|
(...) Glad you like it. I think a big bubble on front sounds kinda luxurious, and I was going for the strictly utilitarian look. I agree that something needs to be done about the boxiness though. (...) This SHIP has been in the planning/contruction (...) (22 years ago, 2-Dec-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: deep-space exploration SHIP "Beagle"
|
|
(...) Unholy indeed, but yep, Star Wars and Jassim. Doesn't get any better. Two-stud-thick walls make it possible to build details right into the walls. And they're a lot stronger than single-stud. I agree about the proportions. The superstructure (...) (22 years ago, 2-Dec-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: deep-space exploration SHIP "Beagle"
|
|
(...) Thanks Admiral. Can't wait to see more pics of the Vanguard. The shuttlebay/engine arrangement of that one looks real good (and a little familiar ;-) I concocted the converted freighter bit as a way to explain how blocky this thing turned out. (...) (22 years ago, 2-Dec-03, to lugnet.space)
|
