Subject:
|
Re: Blacktron vs. Futuron
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Fri, 24 Oct 2003 22:55:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1045 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Mike Petrucelli wrote:
> In lugnet.space, Damien Guichard wrote:
> > I always have considered Blacktron as the polluters, consuming masses of carbon
> > derivatives (may be C-60 or something like that)
> >
> > http://membres.lycos.fr/brickcaster/themes/space/blacktron/
> >
> > and Futuron as the ecologists based on a clean water-cycle technology
> >
> > http://membres.lycos.fr/brickcaster/themes/space/futuron/
> >
> > What is your own opinion about Blacktron vs. Futuron?
> >
> > - Damien
>
> I am probably the only one that made them both on the same side. Futron is the
> Navy. Blacktron is the Army.
>
> -Mike Petrucelli
I would guess you are right that you are the only (or one of a very small
minority) that put them on the same side. TLC even pictured them at odds in
catalogs and instructions.
If they work for the same government (or company), Blacktron is certainly the
Special Ops, undercover folk. Present day Blacktronians ride about in black
helicopters, to be sure.
Aaron S
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Blacktron vs. Futuron
|
| (...) In lugnet.space, Mike Petrucelli wrote: (...) Not quite the only one- me too... sorta. I had them secretly working together but faking a war with each other. They figured that if the other powers in the area thought they were both on high (...) (21 years ago, 24-Oct-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Blacktron vs. Futuron
|
| (...) I am probably the only one that made them both on the same side. Futron is the Navy. Blacktron is the Army. -Mike Petrucelli (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.space)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
