To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.spaceOpen lugnet.space in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Space / 27194
27193  |  27195
Subject: 
Re: To Fleeb or not to Fleeb? Experts agree!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.space
Date: 
Sun, 17 Aug 2003 17:35:58 GMT
Viewed: 
570 times
  
In lugnet.space, Chris Maddison wrote:
   Ladies and Gents,

Recent studies have led to some startling results. See below for more.

http://xcalabur.topcities.com/spacecraft/notfleeb.html

Thanks all on the comments and name suggestions. Large number of kronbeelfs...I’d thought of that one, but nah...doesn’t fit. I’m favoring Flurgids at the moment. More testing must be done before this creature can be properly cataloged. :-)





Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: To Fleeb or not to Fleeb? Experts agree!
 
(...) Wait! Wait! I've got another one: Dweebnorks! :) Why don't you make a poll? (URL) (21 years ago, 17-Aug-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  To Fleeb or not to Fleeb? Experts agree!
 
Ladies and Gents, Recent studies have led to some startling results. See below for more. (URL) More news on this startling discovery at 11. (URL) p.s. - I wanted an excuse to use my new sigfig. :-) p.p.s. - I figured this little thing of mine had (...) (21 years ago, 16-Aug-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)  

17 Messages in This Thread:













Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR