|
In lugnet.space, Michael Bosch wrote:
> If I might interject and flog this dead beast some more, if there was fusion
> energy available, why the need for humans? If the robots had fusion
> technology, the only point in keeping people around would be as reactor
> fodder, NOT as a source of power themselves.
If you think that's a problem, consider this. How much energy do they need
to produce to _feed_ all of those people? How much energy are those people
capable of producing? Where do they get all the extra energy required to keep
up with food production for their power-hungry "batteries"? Humans cannot
produce more energy than their intake, so they would actually cause a _loss_ of
power when used as batteries. Of course,t hat would pretty much blow the entire
purpose of doing the movie...
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: Matrix Weapon Tech
|
| (...) My impression from the first movie is that after a human is no longer useful for energy production, they are pureed and fed to other humans thru IVs. You still have a net loss of chemical energy each generation though, since some carbon, (...) (21 years ago, 7-Aug-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Matrix Weapon Tech
|
| (...) ditto (...) If I might interject and flog this dead beast some more, if there was fusion energy available, why the need for humans? If the robots had fusion technology, the only point in keeping people around would be as reactor fodder, NOT as (...) (21 years ago, 7-Aug-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|