 | | Re: New space building standard and submission to www.classic-space.com
|
|
(...) Hi Jesse, I agree with you. Simple ideas should have simple presentation. It also came to my mind that the real or perceived complexity of my building system may be a poor mist for charlatanism. I am not naive: where there is seduction there (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: New space building standard and submission to www.classic-space.com
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) Thanks, this has at least helped me to understand what you're getting at. But it seems to me that this system doesn't account for building techniques that work at multiple angles. For example, using bricks with studs on the side (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: New space building standard and submission to www.classic-space.com
|
|
(...) Hi Lucas, Studs on side are taken into account in basic cases such as headligths (as "light") and cone engines (as "egret"). Remember the building system is designed for classic space theme (early 1980s). There was no bricks with studs on the (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
