|
|
 | | Re: Old stuff, NEW pictures!
|
| (...) Me sorry (...) Holy cow, dude! I'd have to buy two seats on the airplane! :^) (...) Hmmmm, is there a way it could be done virtually? (...) Eventually, from the flames of Gibralter shall rise another insane creation, you have my word. I was (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.gaming)
| | | | | Re: Old stuff, NEW pictures!
|
| (sob) Yeah, gotta do it soon, man. We need to set up the extra room for the baby and that ship is so big I can't really put it anywhere else in the apartment. But I intend to keep it together until I can get better pics of the whole ship again. This (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space)
| | | | | Re: Wings [was: Re: Building big]
|
| (...) We know it's true, since we have our nice and handy fluid mechanics calculations. The drag experienced by a vehicle depends on a number of factors, including surface area, drag coefficient, viscosity and density of fluid, and the velocity of (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Irresponsible use of spacecraft (was Re: Wings [was: Re: Building big])
|
| (...) :) Yes. People should buy much more economical atmospheric craft if they're not going into outer space. Just think of the extra fuel used by dragging those hyperspace drives around with your atmospheric thrusters. Sure, you can see over the (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Re: Wings [was: Re: Building big]
|
| (...) those (...) that (...) for (...) And what happens if you need to detect that undetectable tachyon pulse signature and you've left off the tachyon pulse antenna?! It makes me sick the way that spaceships have got so fashionable now that (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.loc.au)
|
|
