|
|
 | | Re: MOC: Stinger
|
| (...) So the Stinger's four arms must be even scarier! (...) It is a very cool-looking ship. I wonder how long I can resist the lure of the Duplo egg. Cheers, (URL) Sci-Fi LEGO> (22 years ago, 21-Oct-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | Re: New MOC: II-Blade
|
| (...) Dude, I agree. Wow. You should be ashamed of yourself, Bram. :) j/k Critisism? CRITISISM? Well, if you really want to eek one out... the front of the cockpit underneath the slope does look a little bare but you seem to of already noticed that (...) (22 years ago, 20-Oct-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | Re: MOC: Stinger
|
| In lugnet.space, Allister McLaren wrote: <snip> (...) Nah, I think both the name and the form both make it much less innocent. Theres somthing I like about a central column with a wide opening at the end sorrounded by three large energy-generating (...) (22 years ago, 20-Oct-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | Re: 5 MOCs
|
| Arr, nice to see that Spamcake is not dead. (...) Both are nice. Its great to see such wild color schemes on a MOC. The future speeder especially looks wild. Cool. (...) This is my favorite, too. All the weird angles and greeblies makes this one (...) (22 years ago, 20-Oct-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | Re: MOC: Stinger
|
| Allister, Great unique shape on this model. This would have been a good entry for that "useless parts" contest last year with the egg piece and every variant on a barrel piece. Bruce (22 years ago, 20-Oct-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
|
