 | | RE: Finally able to add asm forth words. —Ralph Hempel
|
| | | (...) As they say (with a striaght face in the original C library) "Use the fork, Luke" I hope you didn't find the M4 stuff too much of a brain-bender. I'd be hard pressed to tell you how it works anymore... (...) Ummm, because the original hForth (...) (25 years ago, 22-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Finally able to add asm forth words. —Steven J. Morris
|
| | | | (...) It puzzled me for quite a while until I realized that the output was in pbforth.s. Once I saw the results it was much easier. (...) I agree. I have no interest in supporting a varient. I'll hack until it seems to work and then pass it to you (...) (25 years ago, 22-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | RE: Finally able to add asm forth words (long) —Ralph Hempel
|
| | | | (...) Steve, You ARE using Kekoa's Internals document, right? Here's the part that describes the interrupt vector redirection. In fact, that's what I do for grabbing the OC1B interrupt for the servo control words... remember intercepting the (...) (25 years ago, 22-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Finally able to add asm forth words (long) —Steven J. Morris
|
| | | | (...) Yep. But if I have two choices I will always steal from working code over documentation. I will always write code in C first and see what assembler the compiler creates, especialy on a new machine. Trust what already works. -- (...) (25 years ago, 22-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| | | | |
