To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqcOpen lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / RCX / NQC / 419
418  |  420
Subject: 
Re: opposite of float command for nqc ?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
Date: 
Thu, 27 Jan 2000 05:09:37 GMT
Viewed: 
2208 times
  
Thanx.  That solved my problem.

externally turn the shaft.  You can prevet this from happening by • including a
worm gear in your setup. The worm gear can drive other gears both • directions
(up & down in your case), but cannot itself be driven by the gear it • drives.
Thus, when not powered, the worm gear acts as a locking mechanism. I have • used
this method in crane applications, stair climbers, and other applications • where
I don't want an unpowered gear train to slip.

Good luck!

- Jeff Barrett



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: opposite of float command for nqc ?
 
In NCQ & RCX Code, "Off" is the closest one gets to "locking" a motor. It will resist being turned, but in a crane application I can envision enough force to externally turn the shaft. You can prevet this from happening by including a worm gear in (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)

3 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR