Subject:
|
Re: "No reply from RCX" with nqc...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
|
Date:
|
Thu, 9 Dec 1999 20:39:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2222 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, Dave Baum writes:
> In article <FMH02H.4vG@lugnet.com>, "Jon" <post@scribble.com> wrote:
> > upon trying to do anything with rcx (rcx -near, rcx -firmware..) i am
> > getting "No reply from RCX". i have the tower sitting about 6 inches
> > from the rcx.
>
> Try this:
>
> nqc -v -raw 10
>
> and then also this (substituting the right filename)
>
> nqc -v -firmware <filename>
thank you (and bob fay) for your two responses. i have a sneaking suspicion
that bob was right on with the curious battery problem. i opened my
tower battery case and "re-seated" the battery. (and i confirmed it *was*
in the proper orientation.) next, i tried nqc -v -raw 10 and it worked!
i am guessing it was *not* the "-v" option that magically worked, so it
may be a good thing to note that there could be some battery quirkiness
on the tower.
also: apologies for typing "rcx" in my originally post when i meant "nqc".
4 am, up playing with legos! also, more apologies for calling it a *red*
led when it is apparently green. i am colorblind, and was guessing!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: "No reply from RCX" with nqc...
|
| (...) Try this: nqc -v -raw 10 and then also this (substituting the right filename) nqc -v -firmware <filename> and post the results. The "-v" option turns on some logging that may help us figure out what is wrong. (...) The firmware file is (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
