 | | Re: About SetSerialComm(SERIAL_COMM_DEFAULT);
|
|
My new question is how to receive this packet data sent by SendSerialData()? Zhengrong (...) (23 years ago, 7-Sep-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | About SetSerialComm(SERIAL_COMM_DEFAULT);
|
|
Hi, Dave In your NQC Guide, there is a text about this function "The default is to send data at 2400 baud using a 50% duty cycle on a 38kHz carrier.", how about other settings, for example, parity and stop bit, is it odd parity without stop bit? (...) (23 years ago, 7-Sep-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | monitoring touch sensor
|
|
Greetings I have recently been learning to program in NQC and have run into a problem. I would like to monitor a touch sensor (with a Scout) so that if the sensor is pressed once and held down a motor runs forward. If the touch sensor is pressed (...) (23 years ago, 31-Aug-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | NQC can send/receive starnard firmware message to/from legOS
|
|
Check this message (URL) (23 years ago, 29-Aug-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Love the new Music capability with the new firmware!
|
|
(...) Use NQC for that. Wonderful 2.0 support. Dean -- Dean Husby LUGNET Member #320 TFM's LEGO Workshop - www.akasa.bc.ca/tfm The Vancouver LEGO Club - www.akasa.bc.ca/vlc/ (23 years ago, 27-Aug-01, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX 2.0 Arrays
|
|
(...) Fixing that has been on the to-do list for a long time. But it just isn't a high priority since there are easy workarounds. Right now adding USB support is top priority. Dave Baum (23 years ago, 26-Aug-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX 2.0 Arrays
|
|
(...) Manual? Manual! We don't need no stinking manual. Thanks, ("I guess I should read it", he says sheepishly) (23 years ago, 26-Aug-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX 2.0 Arrays
|
|
The NQC manual says... "Neither arrays nor their elements can be used with the increment (++) or decrement (--) operators." I guess it's not quite C :-) "Frank Caggiano" <caggiano@crystal-objects.com> wrote in message (...) (23 years ago, 25-Aug-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | One other thing arrays and RCX 2.0
|
|
NQC complains with he same error message if i do an arrray[x]++; That is I use a variable for the index rather than a constant. (23 years ago, 25-Aug-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | RCX 2.0 Arrays
|
|
I wanted to increment the value contained in an array. I did array[0]++; NQC complained: ERROR expression is not a legal target for assignment. The carrot under array[0]++ pointed to the index value, that is the 0. It seems NQC thought I was trying (...) (23 years ago, 25-Aug-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
