Subject:
|
Re: SetWatch() only accepts constants
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
|
Date:
|
Wed, 8 Aug 2001 03:47:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2698 times
|
| |
|
|
In article <GHoGwL.8Eq@lugnet.com>, "Frederick N. Brier"
<fbrier@multideck.com> wrote:
> I just wrote a task and function that cause the RCX to receive data from
> the
> PC and then set the time on the RCX using SetWatch(). Unfortunately, I
> didn't realize that SetWatch() only accepts constants. NQC complained
> when
> integer variables were passed. Is this because the special SetWatch()
> opcode only accepts embedded constants and not references to memory
> variables? That probably is what is going on, but if not, would it be
> possible to change it so it can accept variables?
Sorry, the opcode requires constants - there's not much NQC can do
(aside from generating an enormous switch statement).
Dave
--
reply to: dbaum at enteract dot com
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | SetWatch() only accepts constants
|
| I just wrote a task and function that cause the RCX to receive data from the PC and then set the time on the RCX using SetWatch(). Unfortunately, I didn't realize that SetWatch() only accepts constants. NQC complained when integer variables were (...) (23 years ago, 7-Aug-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
