 | | NQC 1.2 has been released
|
|
NQC Version 1.2 adds support for simple inline functions and basic expression evaluation. More details can be found at: (URL) (26 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: RcxCC for NQC 1.1?
|
|
Can you simply replace the nqcc executable in the RcxCC directory with the new version? (...) (26 years ago, 8-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | RcxCC for NQC 1.1?
|
|
I just downloaded RcxCC and noticed that it is still using NQC 1.0b4 Was the RcxCC project abandoned? Why it still uses an outdated version of NQC? Are there any other good alternatives to RcxCC for the new NQC? Thanks Laurentino Martins (...) (26 years ago, 7-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Compiling the compiler
|
|
(...) I've checked into this a little further. It comes down to something like the following: void foo(const char *p) { delete p; } On one hand, this is conceptually a violation of "constness" as a caller to foo() wouldn't know that the object (...) (26 years ago, 6-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Compiling the compiler
|
|
(...) What file are you compiling when you get this error? I think the fix is to include "Symbol.h" before the array templates get instantiated, but it is curious that neither Metrowerks nor gcc complain. (...) Yes, a cast should be fine. Offhand, (...) (26 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
