 | | Communication between 2 Robots - Movement transmition
|
|
Hi! I am a new member of your community, and i would like to ask the following question. Please excuse me if something similar has been already posted in the past, but i performed a seach in the previous posts and i did not found any answer to my (...) (23 years ago, 21-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: maximum number of variables in RCX2 ?
|
|
(...) Lego's usage of the terms'local' and 'global' is a little different than what most people expect. In the RCX, global storage is available across all tasks while local storage is avaialble per task. This is different from the more traditional (...) (23 years ago, 21-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: maximum number of variables in RCX2 ?
|
|
(...) Remember that the RCX has no stack or heap. This means that, effectively, there is no memory pool from which to allocate things. Here, 'local' means belonging to the current task not the current function, and the number of tasks is fixed (at (...) (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: maximum number of variables in RCX2 ?
|
|
Hi John, (...) Yes ! Using more tasks you will get more local space (for each task 16). So maximum number of variables is 32+(16*10) = 192 (...) That's how NQC is handling memory for local variables in functions, subroutines, tasks. Local has a (...) (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: maximum number of variables in RCX2 ?
|
|
(...) this (...) only (...) variables (...) the (...) From my understanding of NQC, the compiler automatically selects the most suitable location to store variables. Global variables are obviously always allocated in one of the 32 global storage (...) (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
